HEADS OF L&D

Reach the 85% your programs can’t.

We extends the reach of every L&D program you’ve already built—reaching every employee at scale, while your facilitators focus where a human is genuinely needed.

Diverse team collaborating around a conference table

Why does even strong L&D stall at the top of the org?

Because delivery has a hard ceiling. Most organizations reach the top 15% of the workforce through formal development (Gartner), and inside that group the personality component gets compressed to make room for broader themes. The other 85%—the bulk of your workforce and most of your managers—get little or nothing.

That’s not a program problem. It’s a capacity problem—not enough hours, not enough calendar, not enough budget to reach everyone the same way.

What does We add to an L&D function?

We adds a continuous layer beneath your existing portfolio, on the same scientific foundation.

Reach—every employee, from individual contributor to senior leader, on one instrument

Staying power—the shared language stays in use between sessions instead of fading at ninety days

Manager support—direct guidance for the population driving 70% of team engagement (Gallup)

Leverage for your team—facilitators focus where a human is genuinely needed, instead of running every conversation themselves

A common vocabulary—the language from your leadership program, spoken organization-wide

Does We compete with our leadership programs?

No—it makes them work harder. Cohort programs and executive coaching deliver depth, challenge, and human relationship—that’s not what We is built to replace. We keeps the same shared language operating between those touchpoints and extends it to people who were never going to get a seat.

Organizations running facilitated workshops, executive coaching, or internal leadership academies keep all of it. Nothing goes away.

What changes for your L&D team?

Your L&D team’s impact expands. We becomes the always-on behavioral layer—complementing the e-learning platforms you already have, or reaching the levels those platforms don’t—while your team spends its time where a human is genuinely irreplaceable: the high-stakes cohort, the executive offsite, the intervention that needs someone in the room.

Your L&D team’s impact expands. We becomes the always-on behavioral layer—complementing the e-learning platforms you already have, or reaching the levels those platforms don’t—while your team spends its time where a human is genuinely irreplaceable: the high-stakes cohort, the executive offsite, the intervention that needs someone in the room.

Facilitator headcount optional for baseline reach; facilitator expertise applied where it’s worth the most.

What about the manager layer specifically?

Managers are the highest-leverage population and the least served. 70% of team engagement is driven by the manager, and manager engagement itself has fallen to 22% globally, down from 27% in two years (Gallup)—so developing managers isn’t a side benefit, it’s the fastest lever you have on engagement overall. We reaches every manager with guidance they can use before the next conversation—conversation guides, team playbooks from combined profiles, pre-meeting prep, building the exact skills the engagement data says are missing.

What can I take to my CHRO and CFO?

Third-party evidence and a defensible model.

$10 trillion—annual cost of low engagement, ~9% of global GDP (Gallup, 2026)

23% / 18%—higher profitability and productivity in engaged business units (Gallup Q12 meta-analysis, 2024)

50–200%—of annual salary, the cost of a single departure (SHRM, Gallup)

70%—of team engagement driven by the manager (Gallup)

Transparent per-person pricing, with no certification fees or facilitator multipliers

What does rollout ask of my team?

Less than you’re expecting. You stay in control of assessment administration, but not person by person—the platform is built to make reaching every employee realistic. There’s no facilitator network to certify and no new infrastructure to stand up. Typical launch: days, not months.

Frequently asked

Will this make our existing programs redundant?

Can we start with managers only?

What if our organization already uses another assessment?

How do we measure whether it's working?